| Every
high school brat knows electrolysis; take a couple of electrodes wire
them up, stick them into a suitable electrolytic solution and wham - hydrogen
and oxygen start co llecting along the electrodes.
What the general populace, however seem blissfully ignorant of is the
fact that by reversing this reaction and combining hydrogen and oxygen
under the right circumstances, you land up producing electricity and good
old H2O. Issac Asimov at his best, only difference being that this little
bit of sci-fi is about to come true, sooner than you think.
At the heart of each fuel cell lies a wafer-thin plastic foil called the
Proton Exchange Membranes (PEM) that is plated with the catalyst, platinum.
The ion exchanger or the PEM allows hydrogen ions (protons) to pass through.
The electrodes are a thin layer of graphite paper that cover the PEM and
are gas permeable. On either side of the electrodes are a pair of graphite
bi-polar plates, through which the hydrogen passes on one side and oxygen
(from the air) on the other. When the two gases react in the presence
of the platinum catalyst, electricity is produced. This feeds the electric
motors which in turn spin the wheels, thereby moving the car forward.
The only emission produced from this reaction is water, so pure that you
can drink it. Boggles the mind, doesnt it?
Fuel cells allow a staggering 80 per cent of the chemical energy locked
away in the fuel to be transformed into electrical energy. Therefore as
far as efficiency is concerned, the piston engine is not even in the same
league.
That fuel cells will power the car of the future there is little doubt.
Prototypes from DaimlerChrysler, Ford, Honda and GM are already cruising
the roads and becoming more and more usable and practical. A couple of
years ago, fuel cell-driven vehicles were normally large vans, but today
Mercedes-Benzs Necar 4 allows for a full complement of passengers
as well as some luggage space. Currently, the undisputed leader in fuel
cell technology is the Canadian company Ballard. How much of a technological
advantage does Ballard have over its rivals? Well, for starters, it has
DaimlerChrysler, Ford, Honda and Volkswagen all queuing up outside its
gates for anything from equity in the company to less formal or binding
contracts for the purchase of fuel cell stacks.
 |
| Ballard's
hydrogen fuel cells look set to power the cars of the future. |
|
Ballards
fuel cell stacks consist of 160 individual cells and vehicles will use any
number of stacks as per their power requirements. Already the new Ballard
Mark 900 fuel cell stack launched early last year produces 75Kw of power
and has been frozen as the basic design for the future. It currently takes
up around 131 litres of space, but expect it to be much more compact in
the near future.
Power delivery and efficiency will also leap ahead and the healthy 75KW
delivered now will seem positively puny. Efficiency too is already twice
as good as that of the best diesels of today, consuming the hydrogen equivalent
of 3 litres for every 100 kilometres. Efficiency is already 50 per cent
better than the earlier model. The system is re-configurable to any design
and Ballard plans to make more than 300,000 units a year by 2004.
|
| Way
back in 1839 Sir William Grove of Oxford observed a reverse flow of current
when he disconnected the power from an electrolysis experiment he was
conducting. He realised that just as you could get hydrogen and oxygen
using electrolysis, electricity could actually be produced by combining
hydrogen and oxygen.
In 1932 Francis T Bacon of Cambridge built the first working example of
a fuel cell-powered machine, a tractor, but due to the high cost of raw
materials and chemically pure gases required, commercialisation was far
away. In 1960 he transferred the fuel cell concept and technology to aviation
giant Pratt & Whitney, and the fuel cells were used for the Apollo
lunar missions. An improved version still powers the space shuttle. So
all that money spent on space exploration was not wasted after all.
It is extremely difficult to digest the fact that technology like fuel
cells remained dormant for almost a century. Its just that the subject,
until recently, hadnt been researched or experimented with as much
as the internal combustion engine. The difference between Sir Groves
system and the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cells in use today,
is the absence of the electrolyte. The PEM is a dry ion exchanger through
which hydrogen ions can pass.
|